I decided to continue the cars & bicycles theme, I started with my previous post and write a quick summary about an interesting article I found a few months ago. LowTechMagazine is a website dedicated to the technology that may make or made our life simpler, more efficient and less energy-dependent but without the unnecessary complexity of many modern solutions. Bicycles, as one of the most efficient transportation vehicles known to a man, obviously fit well in this category. But they are not perfect:
Few people find the bicycle useful for distances longer than 5 km (3 miles). In the USA, for instance, 85 % of bicycle trips involve a trip of less than 5 km. Even in the Netherlands, the most bicycle-friendly country in the western world, 77 % of bike trips are less than 5 km. Only 1 % of Dutch bicycle trips are more than 15 km (9 miles). In contrast, the average car trip amounts to 15.5 km in the USA and 16.5 km in the Netherlands, with the average trip to work being 19.5 km in the USA and 22 km in the Netherlands. (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.) It's clear that the bicycle is not a viable alternative to the car. Depending on his or her fitness, a cyclist reaches cruising speeds of 10 to 25 km/h, which means that the average trip to work would take at least two to four hours, there and back.
According to the author, the solution may come in form of electric velomobiles but not electric cars (at least in their current form). It is because
While electric velomobiles have a speed and range that is comparable to that of electric cars, they are up to 80 times more efficient. If all 300 million Americans replace their car with an electric velomobile, they need only 25 % of the electricity produced by existing American wind turbines. (...) Now imagine that all 300 million Americans replaced their cars with an electric version like the Nissan Leaf, and all drive to work on the same day. To charge the 24 kW battery of each of those 300 million vehicles, we need 7,200 Gwh of electricity. This is 20 times more than what American wind turbines produce today.
This fantastic efficiency of electric velomobiles comes from the fact that
At speeds below 10 km/h (6 mph), rolling resistance is the biggest challenge for a cyclist. Air resistance becomes increasingly influential at higher speeds, and becomes the dominant force at speeds above 25 km/h (15.5 mph).
which means that once we keep moving in a velomobile, we can easily reach "average speed of 40 km/h (25 mph)". But since velomobiles are heavier than regular bicycles, bringing them up to that speed takes some extra energy. This is where electric assist comes handy. The assisted velomobile author tested had a suprisingly small battery on board, only used for acceleration, not cruising. But as calculation showed, "adding only 6 kg of batteries increases the range of the electric velomobile to 450 km". This is much, much better than any electric car that exists today. For example,
The Nissan Leaf takes you at best 160 km, when you drive slowly and steadily, and when you don't make use of the air-conditioning, heating or electronic gadgets on board.
This answers any questions on why electric cars still have such a pathetic range today, despite all progress in battery and electric motor technology. They are just too heavy and too complex. We are so used to our gasoline-powered cars that we don't want to give up on air conditioning, powered windows, heating system, radio and navigation. But all these things suck juice from batteries very quickly and decrease car's range. Velomobiles, thanks to their simplicity, don't have this problem. In fact,
when we compare the (electric velomobile) with the electric car, still viewed by many as the future of sustainable transportation, it's a clear winner.
Unfortunately, this kind of future doesn't look very bright. It is because
The biggest obstacle for manufacturers and drivers of electric velomobiles is legislation.
the very strange fact that a car, for instance a Porsche Cayenne Turbo S with a weight of 2,355 kg, an engine of 382,000 watts and a top speed of 270 km/h can be driven anywhere on Earth, while an electric velomobile with a weight of 35 kg, a motor of 250 watts and an electric assistance of up to 50 km/h is illegal in most countries.
Can electric velomobiles be the future of mid-range transportation? The author seems to think so. And even if the rest of the article considers an utopian scenario of replacing all cars with velomobiles, it is an interesting read.
My unassisted Velomobile is my mode of transportation with over 52,000 miles ridden. I've been car free for over 8 years now.
ReplyDeleteEven with the added weight of a unassisted Velomobile, because of the aerodynamics of a Velomobile compared to a state of the art road bike, a Velomobile rider (Velonaut) uses considerable less energy to go as fast if not faster than a Roadie. The major aerodynamic drag of a road bike is the rider themselves Add the weight of an electric motor and batteries to a Velomobile, that is more weight that you have to over come. A dead battery means dead weight.
ReplyDeleteYou make a good point - on a traditional bicycle the most aero drag comes from the rider, not the bike. This is why velomobiles are so efficient. And it's what makes all those modern aero road bikes a bit silly, but that's another topic.
DeleteThis is a link to a video of me being chased by a friend. These are both pedal powered velomobiles with triple road cranks 55/42/30 tooth chain rings to a 11/34, 9 speed cassette with conventional derailleurs.
ReplyDeleteAt the beginning we are cresting those rollers at 40+ mph. You can hear cheering as he crested that hill.
On the video keep a lookout in the distance ahead of us on the road. At about 40 seconds into the video you start to see something white in the distance. Watch how fast we catch and pass that cyclist in a white kit. I would say that he was doing a good 18 to 20 mph when we went past him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=6QjTJQVs57g